Candy AI vs DarLink AI
Side-by-side comparison on identical, dated criteria. Full reviews: Candy AI · DarLink AI.
| Criterion | Candy AI | DarLink AI |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Credit model | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Censorship transparency | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Persistence | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Data retention | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Exit terms | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| Type | AI companion and roleplay platform | AI girlfriend companion platform |
| Key features | create personalized AI companions; customizable appearance and personality; text-based chat with memory retention; voice messages and conversations; AI-generated images; AI-generated videos; roleplay scenarios; group chat; character selection from 100+ pre-built companions; token-based credit system | AI companion customization (appearance, personality); NSFW chat; In-chat image generation (token-based); In-chat video generation (token-based); Voice options (6 standard, 10 premium); Roleplay creation (quick and deep modes); Message history and memory (basic, enhanced, living); Seductive feed exploration by gender/style/age |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Entry price (USD) | — | $0.43 |
| Ads present | — | — |
| Interface languages | EN | — |
| Age verification | Yes | — |
| Privacy policy | Yes | Yes |
| Takedown procedure | Yes | Yes |
| Last verified | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-15 |
Which one? Choose Candy AI for its stronger exit terms; choose DarLink AI for its stronger data retention. Neither wins outright — match the axis that matters most to you.