Candy AI vs Mage
Side-by-side comparison on identical, dated criteria. Full reviews: Candy AI · Mage.
| Criterion | Candy AI | Mage |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Credit model | 5.5 | 6.5 |
| Censorship transparency | 4.0 | 6.0 |
| Persistence | 7.5 | 2.5 |
| Data retention | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Exit terms | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Type | AI companion and roleplay platform | AI image and video generator |
| Key features | create personalized AI companions; customizable appearance and personality; text-based chat with memory retention; voice messages and conversations; AI-generated images; AI-generated videos; roleplay scenarios; group chat; character selection from 100+ pre-built companions; token-based credit system | unlimited image generation with Gems or membership; text-to-image and image-to-video generation; video generation with multiple AI models; consistent character creation and reuse across images and videos; motion control for AI character videos; face swap, character swap, outfit swap tools; image and video enhancement and upscaling; inpainting and refinement tools; LoRA and custom model imports (Pro Plus+); commercial license and private generations by default |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Entry price (USD) | — | $10 |
| Ads present | — | — |
| Interface languages | EN | — |
| Age verification | Yes | — |
| Privacy policy | Yes | Yes |
| Takedown procedure | Yes | — |
| Last verified | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-15 |
Which one? Choose Candy AI for its stronger persistence; choose Mage for its stronger censorship transparency. Neither wins outright — match the axis that matters most to you.