AI Girlfriend Exit Terms Score Just 3.3 Out of 10
Data in this article comes from our own tracked listings as of — dated scores, documented methods (methodology).
| Platforms scored | 36 |
|---|---|
| Average score | 3.3 |
| Range | 0.5 – 7 |
| Method: declared / observed / inferred | 16 / 4 / 16 |
| Data as of |
| Platform | Score | Method | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luvr AI | 7.0 | declared | 2026-09-15 |
| Promptchan AI | 6.5 | declared | 2026-09-15 |
| Candy AI | 6.0 | declared | 2026-09-15 |
| ChatUp AI | 6.0 | declared | 2026-09-15 |
| Girlfriendly AI | 5.5 | declared | 2026-09-15 |
| My Dream Companion | 5.5 | declared | 2026-09-15 |
| DarLink AI | 5.0 | declared | 2026-09-15 |
| DreamGF.ai | 5.0 | declared | 2026-09-15 |
| eHentai.ai | 5.0 | declared | 2026-09-15 |
| Kupid AI | 5.0 | declared | 2026-09-15 |
| SoulFun | 5.0 | declared | 2026-09-15 |
| TryNectar AI | 5.0 | declared | 2026-09-15 |
| Angel AI | 4.5 | declared | 2026-09-15 |
| ourdream.ai | 4.5 | declared | 2026-09-15 |
| Fantasy.ai | 4.0 | inferred | 2026-09-15 |
| Pornify | 4.0 | declared | 2026-09-15 |
| Dreamle | 3.0 | inferred | 2026-09-15 |
| Nastia | 3.0 | inferred | 2026-09-15 |
| Privee AI | 3.0 | inferred | 2026-09-15 |
| Erogen | 2.5 | inferred | 2026-09-15 |
| Fanfinity | 2.5 | inferred | 2026-09-15 |
| Secret Desires AI | 2.5 | observed | 2026-09-15 |
| AIpornX | 2.0 | inferred | 2026-09-15 |
| JOI | 2.0 | declared | 2026-09-15 |
| Romantic AI | 2.0 | observed | 2026-09-15 |
| Juicy AI | 1.5 | inferred | 2026-09-15 |
| Soulkyn | 1.5 | inferred | 2026-09-15 |
| Texthub | 1.5 | inferred | 2026-09-15 |
| AI Girlfriend WTF | 1.0 | observed | 2026-09-15 |
| GirlfriendGPT | 1.0 | inferred | 2026-09-15 |
| Infatuated.AI | 1.0 | inferred | 2026-09-15 |
| Moescape | 1.0 | inferred | 2026-09-15 |
| TeaseMeAI | 1.0 | inferred | 2026-09-15 |
| Kindroid | 0.5 | inferred | 2026-09-15 |
| Secrets AI | 0.5 | inferred | 2026-09-15 |
| SpicyChat | 0.5 | observed | 2026-09-15 |
As of 2026-09-16, across the 36 platforms we track in AI Girlfriends, exit terms average just 3.3 out of 10, with scores ranging from 0.5 to 7.0. This axis measures whether a platform documents how a user cancels a subscription, obtains a refund, and exports or deletes their data — the practical mechanics of leaving. Only 11% of scores rest on directly observed evidence such as working cancellation flows, while 44% are based on the platform's own declared policy pages and another 44% had to be inferred because no usable documentation existed at all. That split shows an industry where account deletion and data portability are rarely treated as a documented product feature rather than an afterthought.
A handful of platforms publish clear cancellation language
The highest scorers still stop short of full transparency, but they at least give users something concrete to act on. Luvr AI leads the category at 7.0, declared, because its pricing page advertises a 30-day guarantee and 'cancel anytime,' backed by dedicated Cancellation and Refunds policy pages, though self-service export details are not specified. Promptchan AI follows at 6.5, declared, with terms confirming subscriptions can be cancelled anytime via account settings and remain active until the end of the billing cycle, alongside a Refund Policy that is referenced but not detailed. Candy AI and ChatUp AI both score 6.0, declared: Candy AI's pricing page states subscribers can 'cancel subscription at any time in settings' while noting plans 'renew automatically for the same price and term,' and ChatUp AI's terms describe the same account-settings cancellation path with a referenced refund policy, but neither platform spells out refund conditions or a data-export mechanism. Across this top tier, cancellation itself is the one exit mechanic consistently documented; what happens to a user's chat history, generated images, or payment record afterward is left unaddressed.
Most declared policies describe cancellation but stay silent on refunds and exports
A larger cluster of platforms scores in the 4.5–5.5 range, all declared, typically because a cancellation statement exists without supporting detail. Girlfriendly AI (5.5) and My Dream Companion (5.5) both state users can cancel anytime, but the former lacks details on refund conditions or chat/image export while the latter has only an FAQ entry addressing how to stop a subscription. DarLink AI, DreamGF.ai, eHentai.ai, Kupid AI, SoulFun, and TryNectar AI all sit at 5.0: DarLink AI links a Refund Policy without explaining the cancellation process itself; DreamGF.ai and eHentai.ai each publish multiple named policies (Refund, Membership, and for eHentai.ai a Chargeback-Fraud Mitigation Policy) without confirming whether cancellation is self-service; SoulFun requires logging in and submitting a Feedback Form rather than a direct toggle, and its terms explicitly state no refunds are given after cancellation; TryNectar AI allows account deletion 'at any time, for any reason' but funnels disputes into binding arbitration under Section 10.2 with no mention of refunds or export. Angel AI and ourdream.ai (4.5 each), Fantasy.ai (4.0, inferred), and Pornify (4.0, declared, where card-based plans appear to auto-renew based on a crypto-plan exception) round out this tier, each missing at least two of the three core exit elements: cancellation steps, refund terms, and data export.
Nearly half of all scores rely on inference rather than confirmed documentation
The defining feature of this axis is how much of it is unverifiable. With 16 of 36 platforms — 44% — scored through inference, low marks frequently reflect absence of information rather than a confirmed bad policy. Dreamle, Nastia, and Privee AI each score 3.0, inferred, because a Refund Policy or termination clause is named in the legal pages but never detailed. Erogen and Fanfinity sit at 2.5, inferred, the former noting unused membership time is 'not eligible for exchange or refunds' with no standard cancellation process described, the latter offering a Complaint Policy but nothing on refunds or export. AIpornX (2.0, inferred) describes recurring Epoch billing without any cancellation or auto-renewal disclosure. At the bottom, Juicy AI, Soulkyn, and Texthub score 1.5, and GirlfriendGPT, Infatuated.AI, Moescape, and TeaseMeAI score 1.0, all inferred, each missing any cancellation, refund, or export process in the available terms. Kindroid and Secrets AI score just 0.5, inferred, with no terms of service or pricing page located at all. Observed cases compound the problem: Secret Desires AI (2.5) has a broken, 404 terms page; Romantic AI (2.0) has a terms page that fails to render without JavaScript; SpicyChat (0.5) has no accessible terms; and AI Girlfriend WTF (1.0) explicitly reserves the right to suspend or terminate access 'with or without notice.'
What to check before paying
Given how much of this category's exit documentation is missing or inferred, the burden falls on the user to verify conditions before subscribing. Before entering payment details on any AI girlfriend platform, it is worth checking directly rather than assuming a policy exists:
- Whether cancellation can be completed entirely online, in account settings, without contacting support
- Whether a refund policy is stated in specific terms (timeframe, eligible circumstances) rather than just linked by title
- Whether auto-renewal is disclosed clearly, including any difference between payment methods such as card versus crypto
- Whether the platform explains how to export or delete chat history and generated images after leaving
- Whether the terms of service and legal pages actually load and are dated, rather than returning errors or requiring JavaScript
- Whether disputes are routed into arbitration clauses that limit recourse after cancellation
Given that 44% of exit-terms scores in this category were inferred due to missing or broken documentation, users should treat the absence of a clear cancellation and export policy as a signal in itself, independent of any subscription price advertised on the platform's marketing pages.